VALLEY COUNTY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 1:09-cv-275-BLW. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Idaho
Number: infdco20150401f47
Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 31, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 31, 2015
Summary: ORDER B. LYNN WINMILL , Chief District Judge . The Court has before it a motion to clarify and/or amend. The motion states that no party objects. The Court finds good cause to grant the motion. Accordingly, NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the motion to clarify/amend (docket no. 128) is GRANTED. The Memorandum Decision and Order [docket no. 124] is AMENDED to reflect that the Forest Service must only re-evaluate those Management Areas or portions of those Management Areas that were
Summary: ORDER B. LYNN WINMILL , Chief District Judge . The Court has before it a motion to clarify and/or amend. The motion states that no party objects. The Court finds good cause to grant the motion. Accordingly, NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the motion to clarify/amend (docket no. 128) is GRANTED. The Memorandum Decision and Order [docket no. 124] is AMENDED to reflect that the Forest Service must only re-evaluate those Management Areas or portions of those Management Areas that were ..
More
ORDER
B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief District Judge.
The Court has before it a motion to clarify and/or amend. The motion states that no party objects. The Court finds good cause to grant the motion. Accordingly,
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the motion to clarify/amend (docket no. 128) is GRANTED. The Memorandum Decision and Order [docket no. 124] is AMENDED to reflect that the Forest Service must only re-evaluate those Management Areas or portions of those Management Areas that were covered by the McCall/Krassel ROD. This is specifically Management Areas 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, and 13, and portions of Management Areas 6 and 9.
Source: Leagle
