Oganesyan v. Berryhill, 2:17-cv-02541-EFB. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180601a80
Visitors: 15
Filed: May 30, 2018
Latest Update: May 30, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from May 24, 2018 to June 25, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel will be
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from May 24, 2018 to June 25, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel will be ..
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from May 24, 2018 to June 25, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel will be out on leave on the date of the current filing deadline. In addition, Counsel has over 75+ pending social security cases, which require two or more dispositive motions a week until early July. Counsel also has a pending Ninth Circuit matter that require additional levels of review and several civil rights matters which require imminent attention and investigation. Due to current workload demands and upcoming scheduled leave, Counsel needs additional time to adequately review the transcript and properly respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
