WAHPEKECHE v. COLVIN, CIV-14-83-L. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Number: infdco20150326f61
Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 25, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 25, 2015
Summary: ORDER TIM LEONARD , District Judge . On January 6, 2015, Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell entered a Report and Recommendation in this action brought by plaintiff Illa Wahpekeche pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for judicial review of the defendant Commissioner of the Social Security Administration's (Commissioner's) final decision denying plaintiff's application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Commissioner'
Summary: ORDER TIM LEONARD , District Judge . On January 6, 2015, Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell entered a Report and Recommendation in this action brought by plaintiff Illa Wahpekeche pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for judicial review of the defendant Commissioner of the Social Security Administration's (Commissioner's) final decision denying plaintiff's application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Commissioner's..
More
ORDER
TIM LEONARD, District Judge.
On January 6, 2015, Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell entered a Report and Recommendation in this action brought by plaintiff Illa Wahpekeche pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §405(g) for judicial review of the defendant Commissioner of the Social Security Administration's (Commissioner's) final decision denying plaintiff's application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Commissioner's decision be affirmed.
The court file reflects that plaintiff timely filed her Objection to Magistrate's Report & Recommendation, which the court has carefully considered. Upon review of plaintiff's objections, the court finds that they are insufficient to justify overturning the conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. The Magistrate Judge properly found that the record provides substantial evidence to support the final decision of the Commissioner to deny plaintiff's application for disability insurance benefits. Thus, upon de novo review, the court finds that the the Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner to deny plaintiff's application for disability insurance benefits is AFFIRMED.
It is so ordered.
Source: Leagle
