STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT SYNCHRONY BANK'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND ORDER

KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.

This Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to April 12, 2018 is made by and between Plaintiff Juan Sanchez ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Synchrony Bank ("Synchrony") through their respective counsel, in light of the following facts:

RECITALS

On February 22, 2018 Plaintiff served his Complaint on Synchrony.

Synchrony's response to Plaintiff's Complaint is due on or before March 15, 2018.

The parties agree to extend Synchrony's time to respond to the Complaint to April 12, 2018, in order to give Synchrony time to investigate Plaintiff's claims and prepare a proper response, and for the parties to potentially reach a resolution of this matter.

There is good cause to extend Synchrony's response deadline because Synchrony requires additional time to investigate Plaintiff's allegations and prepare a proper response, and the parties require additional time to consider a resolution of this matter.

Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), Plaintiff and Synchrony stipulate that Synchrony's time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to Thursday, April 12, 2018.

This change in deadline will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order, local rules, or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

THEREFORE, the parties stipulate as follows:

STIPULATION

The deadline for Synchrony to respond to the Complaint shall be continued to April 12, 2018. This change in deadline will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by the Court order, local rules, or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.