Brothers v. Buenafe, 1:17-cv-00607-LJO-JDP. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20200116976
Visitors: 22
Filed: Jan. 14, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 14, 2020
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ECF No. 43 ORDER DENYING PENDING SCHEDULING AND DISCOVERY MOTIONS ECF Nos. 40, 42 JEREMY D. PETERSON , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff moves for an extension of time to respond to defendants' motion for summary judgment. For good cause shown, plaintiff's motion is granted. ECF No. 43. Plaintiff shall have thirty days from the date of entry of this order to file his opposition to defendants' motion. The parties have also filed multiple
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ECF No. 43 ORDER DENYING PENDING SCHEDULING AND DISCOVERY MOTIONS ECF Nos. 40, 42 JEREMY D. PETERSON , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff moves for an extension of time to respond to defendants' motion for summary judgment. For good cause shown, plaintiff's motion is granted. ECF No. 43. Plaintiff shall have thirty days from the date of entry of this order to file his opposition to defendants' motion. The parties have also filed multiple ..
More
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
ECF No. 43
ORDER DENYING PENDING SCHEDULING AND DISCOVERY MOTIONS
ECF Nos. 40, 42
JEREMY D. PETERSON, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff moves for an extension of time to respond to defendants' motion for summary judgment. For good cause shown, plaintiff's motion is granted. ECF No. 43. Plaintiff shall have thirty days from the date of entry of this order to file his opposition to defendants' motion.
The parties have also filed multiple motions regarding discovery and scheduling but have failed to confer before filing. See Fed R. Civ. P. 37; Local R. 144. It appears that defendants did not have plaintiff's phone number, see ECF No. 40, but that plaintiff has since provided it, see ECF Nos. 41, 42, 43. Therefore, the parties are directed to discuss whether they can come to an agreement regarding discovery and scheduling. Both parties' pending motions regarding discovery and scheduling are denied without prejudice. ECF Nos. 40, 42.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
