Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Morgan v. Saul, 2:17-cv-00240-DB. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20191218c52 Visitors: 21
Filed: Dec. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 16, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. 2412(d) DEBORAH BARNES , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that plaintiff Joseph B. Morgan (Plaintiff) be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. 2412(d), in the amount of Six Thousand Dollars ($6,500.00). This amount represents compens
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that plaintiff Joseph B. Morgan (Plaintiff) be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of Six Thousand Dollars ($6,500.00). This amount represents compensation for all legal services incurred on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action.

Upon the Court's issuance of an order granting EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will determine the issue of Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff's attorney. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 597-598 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on if the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.

Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government will cause the payment of fees to be made directly to Plaintiff's attorney, LAW OFFICE OF JARED T. WALKER, P.C., pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made to Plaintiff will be delivered to JARED T. WALKER.

This stipulation constitutes a settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA attorney fees and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount will constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff's attorney, including LAW OFFICE OF JARED T. WALKER, P.C., may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.

This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff's counsel to seek Social Security attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA.

SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Andrew Saul became the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration on June 17, 2019. See https://www.ssa.gov/agency/commissioner.html (last visited by the court on July 30, 2019). Accordingly, Andrew Saul is substituted in as the defendant in this action. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (referring to the "Commissioner's Answer"); 20 C.F.R. § 422.210(d) ("the person holding the Office of the Commissioner shall, in his official capacity, be the proper defendant").
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer