WYDNER v. COLVIN, 2:16-cv-00458-KJM-CMK. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160923b04
Visitors: 18
Filed: Sep. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 22, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION FOR FINAL 10 DAY EXTENSION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF CRAIG M. KELLISON , Magistrate Judge . IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Plaintiff to file her Motion for Summary Judgment/Remand be extended ten additional days until September 26, 2016. Undersigned counsel represents no further extensions of time will be requested on Plaintiff's behalf. Plaintiff's counsel has substantially prepared Plaintiff
Summary: STIPULATION FOR FINAL 10 DAY EXTENSION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF CRAIG M. KELLISON , Magistrate Judge . IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Plaintiff to file her Motion for Summary Judgment/Remand be extended ten additional days until September 26, 2016. Undersigned counsel represents no further extensions of time will be requested on Plaintiff's behalf. Plaintiff's counsel has substantially prepared Plaintiff'..
More
STIPULATION FOR FINAL 10 DAY EXTENSION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF
CRAIG M. KELLISON, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Plaintiff to file her Motion for Summary Judgment/Remand be extended ten additional days until September 26, 2016. Undersigned counsel represents no further extensions of time will be requested on Plaintiff's behalf. Plaintiff's counsel has substantially prepared Plaintiff's opening brief but requires additional time to finalize the brief due to conflicting deadlines and obligations for Plaintiff's counsel to meet in separate matters. Plaintiff does not make this request for purposes of delay.
ORDER
Based on the stipulation of the parties, IT IS ORDERED that the deadline for Plaintiff to file her motion for summary judgment in this action is extended through September 26, 2016. No additional extensions of time will be granted to Plaintiff. All other aspects of the Scheduling Order previously issued in this action remain unchanged.
Source: Leagle
