DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

DENISE K. VOWELL, Chief Special Master.

On July 24, 2014, June Reed filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq,2 [the "Vaccine Act" or "Program"] on behalf of her minor daughter, M.C. The petition alleges that as a result of the administration of a rotavirus vaccination on December 3, 2013, M.C. suffered an intussusception which required surgical intervention. (Petition (ECF No. 1) at pp. 1-2.)

On October 28, 2014, I issued a ruling on entitlement, finding petitioner entitled to compensation. (See Ruling on Entitlement (ECF No. 17).) On January 7, 2015, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation ("Proffer") detailing compensation for M.C.'s actual and projected pain and suffering, past unreimbursable expenses related to M.C.'s vaccine-related injury, and a Medicaid lien. According to respondent's Proffer, petitioner agrees to the proposed award of compensation.3 Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award petitioner:

representing compensation for satisfaction of the State of Louisiana Medicaid lien.5

These amounts represent compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RESPONDENT'S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

I. Items of Compensation

For the purposes of this proffer, the term "vaccine-related" is as described in Respondent's Rule 4(c) Report filed on October 28, 2014.

A. Future Unreimbursable Expenses

The parties agree that based upon the evidence of record, MC will not require future care for her vaccine-related injury. Therefore, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded no future unreimbursable expenses under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(1). Petitioner agrees.

B. Lost Future Earnings

The parties agree that based upon the evidence of record, MC will be gainfully employed in the future. Therefore, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded no anticipated loss of earnings under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(B). Petitioner agrees.

C. Pain and Suffering

Respondent proffers that MC should be awarded $35,000.00 in actual and projected pain and suffering. This amount reflects that the award for projected pain and suffering has been reduced to net present value.1 See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.

D. Past Unreimbursable Expenses

Evidence supplied by petitioner documents her expenditure of past unreimbursable expenses related to MC's vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $119.04. Petitioner agrees.

E. Medicaid Lien

Respondent proffers that MC should be awarded funds to satisfy the State of Louisiana Medicaid lien in the amount of $7,990.74, which represents full satisfaction of any right of subrogation, assignment, claim, lien, or cause of action the State of Louisiana may have against any individual as a result of any Medicaid payments the State of Louisiana has made to or on behalf of MC from the date of her eligibility for benefits through the date of judgment in this case as a result of her vaccine-related injury suffered on or about December 3, 2013, under Title XIX of the Social Security Act.

II. Form of the Award

The parties recommend that compensation provided to MC should be made through lump sum payments as described below and request that the Chief Special Master's decision and the Court's judgment award the following:

A. A lump sum payment of $35,000.00, representing compensation for pain and suffering, in the form of a check payable to petitioner as guardian/conservator of MC, for the benefit of MC. No payments shall be made until petitioner provides respondent with documentation establishing that she has been appointed as guardian/conservator of MC's estate. If petitioner is not authorized by a court of competent jurisdiction to serve as guardian/conservator of the estate of MC, any such payment shall be made to the party or parties appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction to serve as guardian/conservator of the estate of MC upon submission of written documentation of such appointment to the Secretary.

B. A lump sum payment of $119.04, representing compensation for past unreimbursable expenses, payable to June Reed, petitioner.

C. A lump sum payment of $7,990.74, representing compensation for satisfaction of the State of Louisiana Medicaid lien, payable jointly to petitioner and

Petitioner agrees to endorse this payment to the above payee.

III. Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment