ROBERT E. BLACKBURN, District Judge.
This matter is before me on the
I have jurisdiction over this case under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federal question) and 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) (Fair Labor Standards Act).
This case involves alleged violations of the wage provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA or Act). The plaintiffs seeks to pursue a collective action under the Act on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated current and former employees of the defendants. Section 216(b) of the FLSA provides the exclusive means of bringing such class-wide claims to redress alleged violations of the FLSA.
A collective action under the FLSA may be maintained only by and among employees who are "similarly situated." The Tenth Circuit has adopted a two-step analysis governing this determination. At the initial "notice stage," the trial court must determine whether plaintiffs have made "substantial allegations that the putative class members were together the victims of a single decision, policy, or plan."
After discovery is complete, the second, or "decertification," stage occurs. At that point, the court applies a much stricter standard to determine whether class members are similarly situated and, consequently, whether the action should continue as a collective action. In making that determination, the court must evaluate, inter alia, "the disparate factual and employment settings of the individual plaintiffs; the various defenses available to defendant which appear to be individual to each plaintiff; fairness and procedural considerations; and whether plaintiffs made any required filings before instituting suit."
The plaintiffs allege that they are non-exempt hourly cooks, trainers, cashiers and maintenance workers who perform work on behalf of the defendants at a McDonald's restaurant operated by the defendants at 245 South Main Street in Longmont, Colorado. According to the complaint [#48], the plaintiffs and other employees of the defendants who are situated similarly were/are not properly paid for all work performed for their employer, including overtime. Complaint [#48], ¶¶ 1-6. In addition, the plaintiffs allege that the defendants failed properly to maintain daily work records for their employees, in violation of the FLSA. Id., ¶ ¶ 8-9.
The actions alleged in the complaint [#48], if proven, violate the provisions of the FLSA. Further, the allegations in the complaint constitute substantial allegations that the plaintiffs and other employees of the defendants were together the victims of a single decision, policy, or plan of the defendants.
The
1. That the
2. That under 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), this case is conditionally certified as a collective action concerning the claims of the named plaintiffs under the Fair Labor Standards Act on behalf of all current and former employees of the defendants;
3. That the
4. That the
4. That if the plaintiffs retain a class action administration service to assist with a large volume of mailing addresses, mailings, and tracking of notices and consents to join, the plaintiffs may change the instructions for return of the consent to join forms as shown in the Notice of Collective Action Lawsuit and/or the Consent Form To Join Lawsuit;
5. That within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this order, the defendants shall provide to counsel for the plaintiffs a list of all hourly employees who worked at the McDonald's restaurant operated by the defendants at 245 South Main Street in Longmont, Colorado, on or after January 8, 2012;
6. That the list of employees shall include for each employee: (1) the name of the employee; (2) the last known mailing address; (3) the last known e-mail address; (4)the last known telephone number; (5) dates of employment; and date of birth;
7. That the plaintiffs shall obtain an accurate Spanish translation of both the
8. That on or before
9. That within 60 days of the mailing of the
10. That the
11. That on or before May 2, 2016, counsel for the plaintiffs shall provide to counsel for the defendants copies of the
12. That from May 4, 2016, through June 15, 2016, the defendants shall post copies of the
13. That the mailing of notice to potential plaintiffs shall be limited to the