Filed: May 21, 2018
Latest Update: May 21, 2018
Summary: FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW and REASONS FOR ORDER OF DETENTION MICHAEL J. WATANABE , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court for detention hearing on May 21, 2018. The court has taken judicial notice of the court's file and the Memorandum dated May 16, 2018. In addition, I have considered the proffer submitted by defense counsel and the arguments of counsel. The defendant is not contesting detention . In order to sustain a motion for detention, the government must esta
Summary: FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW and REASONS FOR ORDER OF DETENTION MICHAEL J. WATANABE , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court for detention hearing on May 21, 2018. The court has taken judicial notice of the court's file and the Memorandum dated May 16, 2018. In addition, I have considered the proffer submitted by defense counsel and the arguments of counsel. The defendant is not contesting detention . In order to sustain a motion for detention, the government must estab..
More
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW and REASONS FOR ORDER OF DETENTION
MICHAEL J. WATANABE, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court for detention hearing on May 21, 2018. The court has taken judicial notice of the court's file and the Memorandum dated May 16, 2018. In addition, I have considered the proffer submitted by defense counsel and the arguments of counsel. The defendant is not contesting detention.
In order to sustain a motion for detention, the government must establish that (a) there is no condition or combination of conditions which could be imposed in connection with pretrial release that would reasonably insure the defendant's presence for court proceedings; or (b) there is no condition or combination of conditions which could be imposed in connection with pretrial release that would reasonably insure the safety of any other person or the community. The former element must be established by a preponderance of the evidence, while the latter requires proof by clear and convincing evidence.
If there is probable cause to believe that the defendant committed an offense which carries a maximum term of imprisonment of over 10 years and is an offense prescribed by the Controlled Substances Act, a rebuttable presumption arises that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the person as required and the safety of the community.
The Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g), directs the court to consider the following factors in determining whether there are conditions of release that will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and the safety of any other person and the community:
(1) [t]he nature and circumstances of the offense charged, including whether the offense is a crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug;
(2) the weight of the evidence against the person;
(3) the history and characteristics of the person, including —
(A) the person's character, physical and mental condition, family ties, employment, financial resources, length of residence in the community, community ties, past conduct, history relating to drug or alcohol abuse, criminal history, and record concerning appearance at court proceedings; and
(B) whether at the time of the current offense or arrest, the person was on probation, on parole, or on other release pending trial, sentencing, appeal, or completion of sentence for an offense under Federal, State or local law; and
(4) the nature and seriousness of the danger to any person or the community that would be posed by the person's release.
The government is requesting detention in this case. In making my findings of fact, I have taken judicial notice of the court's file and the Memorandum dated May 16, 2018. In addition, I have considered the proffer submitted by defense counsel and the arguments of counsel. Weighing the statutory factors set forth in the Bail Reform Act, I find the following:
First, the defendant has been charged in the Indictment with Illegal Re-entry of a Removed Alien Subsequent to a Felony Conviction in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1). Based upon the Indictment, I find probable cause exists that the defendant committed the charged offense.
Second, I find that on April 27, 2018, the defendant plead guilty to Manufacture a Schedule I and II Controlled Substance 14-225 Grams (felony) in Arapahoe County District Court in Centennial, Colorado in Case No. 17-CR-2914. On that same date, the defendant was sentenced to four years in the Colorado Department of Corrections with 197 days presentence credit. The defendant's estimated parole eligibility date August 30, 2019. Defendant is a flight risk.
In light of these facts, I find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that defendant is a flight risk and that there is no condition or combination of conditions of release which will reasonably assure the appearance of the Defendant. Accordingly, I order that the defendant be detained without bond.
