Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Johnson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 16-165V. (2017)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: infdco20170616a45 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 18, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 18, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED DECISION ON ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS 1 NORA BETH DORSEY , Chief Special Master . On February 3, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleged that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ("SIRVA") following receipt of her September 17, 2014 influenza vaccination. On October 27, 2016, the undersigned issued a decision
More

UNPUBLISHED

DECISION ON ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS1

On February 3, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleged that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ("SIRVA") following receipt of her September 17, 2014 influenza vaccination. On October 27, 2016, the undersigned issued a decision awarding compensation to petitioner based on respondent's proffer. (ECF No. 30).

On December 14, 2016, petitioner filed a motion for attorneys' fees and costs. (ECF No. 61). Petitioner requests total attorneys' fees and costs in the amount of $29,025.78, including attorneys' fees in the amount of $27,057.00 and attorneys' costs and advances in the amount of $1,968.78. (ECF No. 34, p. 29.) In compliance with General Order #9, petitioner has filed a signed statement indicating petitioner incurred no out-of-pocket expenses.

On December 30, 2016, respondent filed a response to petitioner's motion. (ECF No. 35). Respondent argues that "[n]either the Vaccine Act nor Vaccine Rule 13 contemplates any role for respondent in the resolution of a request by a petitioner for an award of attorneys' fees and costs." Id. at 1. Respondent adds, however, that she "is satisfied the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys' fees and costs are met in this case." Id. at 2. Respondent "respectfully recommends that the Chief Special Master exercise her discretion and determine a reasonable award for attorneys' fees and costs." Id. at 3.

On November 4, 2016, the undersigned issued a reasoned decision in Henry v. HHS, No. 15-545V, 2016 WL 7189925 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Nov. 4, 2016), addressing hourly rates for the McLaren firm. The undersigned concluded that petitioner's counsel should be compensated at rates which are consistent with the rates requested in the instant application with the exception of the hourly rates billed for attorney travel time and for work performed by law clerks and paralegals in 2016. The undersigned adopts the reasoning in the Henry decision for the instant analysis.

The undersigned has reviewed the billing records submitted with petitioner's request. In the undersigned's experience, the request appears reasonable, and the undersigned finds no cause to reduce the requested hours or costs. However, consistent with Henry, supra, the undersigned reduces the award to reflect a rate reduction for travel time and for 2016 law clerk and paralegal rates.

In February 2016, Mr. Cochran billed a total of 11.1 hours for travel time, amounting to billing of $3,940.50. (ECF No. 34-2, p. 5.) Notwithstanding the fact that Mr. Webb was noted to be working on case review en route, the undersigned reduces these hours by 50%. See, e.g., Hocraffer v. HHS, No. 99-533V, 2011 WL 3705153, at *24 (noting that "Special masters consistently award compensation for travel time at 50% of the billing rate in the Vaccine Program."). This results in a reduction of $1,970.25.

Additionally, there was 13.9 hours of paralegal time billed at a rate of $150 per hour, amounting to billing of $2,085.00.00. (ECF No. 34-2, p. 13.) Reducing the hourly rate to $145 reduces the total amount to $2,015.50, a reduction of $69.50.

Based on all of the above, the undersigned finds that petitioner's counsel is entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs as follows:

Requested attorneys' fees (based on 92 total hours): $27,057.00 Less 50% reduction for 11.1 travel hours: -$1,970.25 Less 2016 paralegal rate reduction: -$69.50 Adjusted total: $25,017.25 ___________ Costs: $1,968.78 Total Attorneys' Fees and Costs Awarded: $26,986.03

Accordingly, the undersigned awards a lump sum of $26,986.03, representing reimbursement for attorneys' fees and costs, in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner and petitioner's counsel, Black McLaren Jones Ryland & Griffee, P.C.

The clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
2. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all "§" references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
3. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties' joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer