U.S. v. SUTHERLAND, 2:10-cr-0356-LDG-LRL. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20120113648
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jan. 10, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 10, 2012
Summary: ORDER LLOYD D. GEORGE, District Judge. The government has filed objections to defendant Sutherland's expert report of Thomas Tarter (#198, response #203, reply #204). The briefs raise sufficient grounds to conduct a hearing on whether Tarter's proposed testimony is admissible under Fed. R. Evid. 702, whether its probative value is outweighed by the risk of waste of time and jury confusion, and whether Tarter's opinion is reliable under the standards of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals,
Summary: ORDER LLOYD D. GEORGE, District Judge. The government has filed objections to defendant Sutherland's expert report of Thomas Tarter (#198, response #203, reply #204). The briefs raise sufficient grounds to conduct a hearing on whether Tarter's proposed testimony is admissible under Fed. R. Evid. 702, whether its probative value is outweighed by the risk of waste of time and jury confusion, and whether Tarter's opinion is reliable under the standards of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, I..
More
ORDER
LLOYD D. GEORGE, District Judge.
The government has filed objections to defendant Sutherland's expert report of Thomas Tarter (#198, response #203, reply #204). The briefs raise sufficient grounds to conduct a hearing on whether Tarter's proposed testimony is admissible under Fed. R. Evid. 702, whether its probative value is outweighed by the risk of waste of time and jury confusion, and whether Tarter's opinion is reliable under the standards of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S.579 (1993). Accordingly,
THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that a hearing on these matters be conducted in Courtroom 6B on the 18th day of January, 2012, at 11:00 a.m.
Source: Leagle
