Voip-Pal.Com, Inc. v. Cellco Partnership, 2:16-cv-00271 (RCJ) (VCF). (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180821d66
Visitors: 14
Filed: Aug. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 20, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . Before the Court is the Plaintiff VoIP-Pal's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant Verizon's Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. After careful consideration, the Court finds good cause exists to grant the requested relief. Plaintiff VoIP-Pal's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant Verizo
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . Before the Court is the Plaintiff VoIP-Pal's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant Verizon's Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. After careful consideration, the Court finds good cause exists to grant the requested relief. Plaintiff VoIP-Pal's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant Verizon..
More
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS
ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Plaintiff VoIP-Pal's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant Verizon's Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. After careful consideration, the Court finds good cause exists to grant the requested relief. Plaintiff VoIP-Pal's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant Verizon's Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint is GRANTED as follows:
1. Plaintiff VoIP-Pal shall have up to and including September 6, 2018 to respond to Defendant Verizon's Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
