HOFFERT v. POWELSON, 11-cv-02382-LTB-KLM. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20120531928
Visitors: 18
Filed: May 29, 2012
Latest Update: May 29, 2012
Summary: ORDER LEWIS T. BABCOCK, District Judge. This case is before me on the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge issued and served on May 9, 2012 (Doc 51). Plaintiff has failed to file specific written objections to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation and is therefore barred from de novo review. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the recommendation is accepted and Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc 8) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for Plaintiff's failure to pro
Summary: ORDER LEWIS T. BABCOCK, District Judge. This case is before me on the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge issued and served on May 9, 2012 (Doc 51). Plaintiff has failed to file specific written objections to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation and is therefore barred from de novo review. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the recommendation is accepted and Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc 8) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for Plaintiff's failure to pros..
More
ORDER
LEWIS T. BABCOCK, District Judge.
This case is before me on the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge issued and served on May 9, 2012 (Doc 51). Plaintiff has failed to file specific written objections to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation and is therefore barred from de novo review. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the recommendation is accepted and Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc 8) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute.
Source: Leagle
