Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

FIRST 100, LLC v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP., 2:15-cv-01303-APG-PAL. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160208904 Visitors: 25
Filed: Feb. 05, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION DEADLINE [First Request] ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Pursuant to LR 6-1, Plaintiff FIRST 100, LLC ("Plaintiff"), Defendant FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP. ("FHLM") and Intervenor FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY ("FHFA") (FHLM and FHFA are collectively referred to as "Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to continue Plaintiff's Opposition deadline to Defendants' Motion for
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION DEADLINE

[First Request]

Pursuant to LR 6-1, Plaintiff FIRST 100, LLC ("Plaintiff"), Defendant FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP. ("FHLM") and Intervenor FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY ("FHFA") (FHLM and FHFA are collectively referred to as "Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to continue Plaintiff's Opposition deadline to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. 32], filed on January 11, 2016, as follows:

On January 11, 2016, Defendants filed their Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. 32]. On January 25, 2016, this Court issued an Order granting the Parties' Stipulation to Stay Discovery [Dkt. 35] pending the outcome of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. 32] is currently due February 4, 2016. Due to the nature and potential impact of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, as well as scheduling issues for Plaintiff's counsel, additional time is needed to formulate an Opposition.

Defendants have agreed to extend Plaintiff's Opposition deadline to allow Plaintiff to file a response on or before March 7, 2016. Plaintiff believes this extension of time will allow the complex issues presented to be fully briefed and does not anticipate additional time beyond said extension being necessary. The Parties have entered into this stipulation in good faith and not for the purposes of delay.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer