Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 3:07-md-1827-SI. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130528i65 Visitors: 3
Filed: May 23, 2013
Latest Update: May 23, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING FURTHER DEPOSITIONS SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge. STIPULATION REGARDING FURTHER DEPOSITIONS IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, Plaintiff Interbond Corporation of America (Brandsmart) and its subsidiaries ("Plaintiff"), on the one hand, and defendants in the above-captioned action ("Defendants"), on the other hand (each a "Party" and collectively, the "Parties"), as f
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING FURTHER DEPOSITIONS

SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.

STIPULATION REGARDING FURTHER DEPOSITIONS

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, Plaintiff Interbond Corporation of America (Brandsmart) and its subsidiaries ("Plaintiff"), on the one hand, and defendants in the above-captioned action ("Defendants"), on the other hand (each a "Party" and collectively, the "Parties"), as follows:

1. To the extent a witness is listed on a Party's pretrial witness list and has not been previously deposed in this MDL, that Party shall make the witness available for deposition as soon as is reasonably practicable and at least one month before trial. 2. To the extent any Party submits a declaration, affidavit, or other witness statement in support of or in opposition to a summary judgment motion or other motion in the above-captioned action, and the declarant, affiant, or witness has not yet been deposed in this MDL, that Party shall make that declarant, affiant, or witness available for deposition at least two weeks before any responsive pleading is due, or if there is no responsive pleading, then at least two weeks before a hearing is scheduled on the motion, or if no hearing is scheduled on the motion, then no more than three weeks after the declaration, affidavit, or witness statement is submitted (or at such other time to which the parties may agree). 3. The Parties shall abide by the Special Master's Order re: Deposition Protocol, MDL Dkt. No. 1546 in scheduling depositions and determining appropriate deposition locations. 4. Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall apply only to declarants, affiants or witnesses currently or formerly employed by a Party. 5. If a declarant, affiant or witness is neither a current or former employee of the Party, then the Party agrees: (i) to use best efforts to secure the cooperation of the prospective witness; (ii) to provide any known contact information for the to a deposition pursuant to a Rule 45 subpoena on the grounds that discovery has closed.

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer