Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DRESSER-RAND, COMPANY v. RED\LINE INTERNATIONALE SPEDITION, GmbH, C 13-0371-JCS. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20131024b47 Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 23, 2013
Latest Update: Oct. 23, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING JURISDICTION JOSEPH C. SPERO, District Judge. The Parties hereto, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. Dresser-Rand, GmbH ("Dresser-Rand") has initiated legal proceedings in Germany against unserved Defendant Red\Line Internationale Spedition, GmbH ("Red\Line"), for the recovery of those damages alleged in Plaintiffs' Complaint in the above-entitled action. 2. Red\Line in turn has initiated indemnity proceedings in the Courts of Hambur
More

STIPULATION REGARDING JURISDICTION

JOSEPH C. SPERO, District Judge.

The Parties hereto, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. Dresser-Rand, GmbH ("Dresser-Rand") has initiated legal proceedings in Germany against unserved Defendant Red\Line Internationale Spedition, GmbH ("Red\Line"), for the recovery of those damages alleged in Plaintiffs' Complaint in the above-entitled action.

2. Red\Line in turn has initiated indemnity proceedings in the Courts of Hamburg, Germany against Hapag-Lloyd AG ("Hapag-Lloyd") for any losses it sustains as a result of the legal action brought by Dresser-Rand, GmbH against Red\Line Internationale Spedition, GmbH in the German Courts.

3. Dresser-Rand and Red\Line have agreed to resolve Dresser-Rand's claim against Red\Line as set forth in the German proceedings, and Red\Line has agreed to dismiss its legal action in the Hamburg, Germany Courts against Hapag Lloyd, so long as Hapag-Lloyd agrees to submit to the jurisdiction of this Court for the purpose of resolving those claims alleged in Plaintiffs' Complaint herein, the alleged claims of Red\Line having been assigned to Dresser-Rand by agreement between those parties.

4. In exchange for the full and complete dismissal of the proceedings in Germany against Hapag-Lloyd relating to the damaged cargo identified in Plaintiffs' Complaint herein, and in exchange for the agreement of Dresser-Rand and Red\Line that claims against Hapag-Lloyd and all other Hapag-Lloyd companies arising from such damage will only be brought against Hapag-Lloyd in this Court, Hapag-Lloyd agrees to submit to the jurisdiction of this Court for purpose of defending against those claims. Further, Hapag-Lloyd agrees that it will not assert any defenses, in this action, based on jurisdiction and venue as may be allowed by its Bill of Lading or Red\Line's Bill of Lading or otherwise.

5. The Parties hereto agree that by Hapag-Lloyd submitting to jurisdiction and venue in this Court for those claims alleged in Plaintiffs' complaint herein and for those claims assigned to Dresser-Rand from Red\Line, Hapag-Lloyd waives no other defenses and that it reserves all other rights and defenses including, but not limited to, the right to assert limitations of liability as allowed by relevant Bills of Lading, and applicable law, and all other available defenses.

6. All other parties hereto reserve all of their rights and defenses.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer