Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

SOTO v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., 3:12-cv-1377-SI. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130507842 Visitors: 19
Filed: May 06, 2013
Latest Update: May 06, 2013
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge. This stipulation is entered into by Plaintiffs Alex Soto and Vince Eagen ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant American Honda Motor Co., Inc. ("Honda" or "Defendant") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, with reference to the following facts and recitals: A. Plaintiffs filed their Class Action Complaint in the subject action on March 19, 2
More

JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.

This stipulation is entered into by Plaintiffs Alex Soto and Vince Eagen ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant American Honda Motor Co., Inc. ("Honda" or "Defendant") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, with reference to the following facts and recitals:

A. Plaintiffs filed their Class Action Complaint in the subject action on March 19, 2012.

B. In light of the Parties' discussions as to possible resolution of the case, the Parties proposed a brief extension of time for Defendant to produce certain Electronically Stored Information ("ESI"), and for Plaintiffs to complete the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of Defendant and to file the Motion for Class Certification. On April 1, 2013, the Court adopted the Parties' proposed ESI production and class certification briefing schedule as follows [Docket Entry. No. 67]:

• Defendant's Production #13 April 12, 2013 • Defendant's Production #14 April 19, 2013 • Defendant's Production #15 April 26, 2013 • Defendant's Production #16 April 30, 2013 • Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification May 24, 2013 • Defendant's Opposition July 26, 2013 • Plaintiffs' Reply August 30, 2013

C. In accordance with the Court's April 1 Order, Defendant produced ESI on April 12, 19, and 26.

D. The Parties have recently engaged in further discussion about potential resolution of the case, and have scheduled an in-person conference with counsel to further discuss resolution and to potentially mediate the case.

E. Because of these settlement discussions, and should these discussions not lead to the ultimate resolution of the case, the Parties require additional time within which to complete ESI discovery, the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition, and filing the intended Motion for Class Certification.

F. The Parties therefore respectfully ask the Court to adopt the following slightly modified schedule:

•bull; Defendant's Production #16 May 10, 2013 •bull; Defendant's Production #17 May 17, 2013 •bull; Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification June 7, 2013 •bull; Defendant's Opposition August 9, 2013 •bull; Plaintiffs' Reply September 13, 2013

[PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

Good cause appearing therefor, the above JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION is approved and all parties shall comply with its provisions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer