STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT IMPOSED BY LOCAL RULE 7-4

RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, District Judge.

Defendant Bank of America, N.A. ("BANA"), Intervenors Federal National Mortgage Association ("Fannie Mae"), Federal Housing Finance Agency, as Conservator of Fannie Mae ("FHFA"), and Plaintiff My Home Now, LLC ("My Home"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

1. On July 15, 2015 BANA filed its Motion for Summary Judgment ("the Motion") (Dkt. #42);

2. On July 28, 2015 Fannie Mae and FHFA filed their Joinder to the Motion (Dkt. #46);

3. On August 6, 2015 My Home filed its Opposition to the Motion (Dkt. #52), which was 41 pages in length;

4. Filed contemporaneously with this Stipulation is BANA, Fannie Mae and FHFA's Reply in Support of the Motion, which is 29 pages in length.

Given the length of the Motion and Opposition and the complex issues presented in this case, My Home's Opposition to the Motion and BANA, Fannie Mae and FHFA's Reply in Support of the Motion has and will exceed the standard limit of 30 pages and 20 pages, respectively. It is necessary for parties to exceed the standard page limits so as to adequately address the issues raised in the Motion.

Permitting the parties to file briefs in excess of the standard page limits is warranted under the circumstances in this case and will not result in prejudice to any party. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-4, BANA, Fannie Mae and FHFA will provide the Court with a table of contents and table of authorities in their Reply.

Therefore, the parties stipulate and agree that My Home's Opposition to the Motion and BANA, Fannie Mae and FHFA's Reply in Support of the Motion may exceed the 30 page and 20 page limits, respectively, imposed by Local Rule 7-4.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.