Filed: Jan. 10, 2013
Latest Update: Jan. 10, 2013
Summary: UNITED STATES' MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT LLOYD D. GEORGE, District Judge. The United States, by and through the undersigned, respectfully moves the Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36, to amend the Judgment in the above-captioned matter due to clerical error. On December 11, 2012, the Court sentenced the defendant to thirty-seven (37) months confinement, three (3) years supervised release with special conditions, a $200 assessment, and restitution in the amount of $320,266
Summary: UNITED STATES' MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT LLOYD D. GEORGE, District Judge. The United States, by and through the undersigned, respectfully moves the Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36, to amend the Judgment in the above-captioned matter due to clerical error. On December 11, 2012, the Court sentenced the defendant to thirty-seven (37) months confinement, three (3) years supervised release with special conditions, a $200 assessment, and restitution in the amount of $320,266...
More
UNITED STATES' MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT
LLOYD D. GEORGE, District Judge.
The United States, by and through the undersigned, respectfully moves the Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36, to amend the Judgment in the above-captioned matter due to clerical error.
On December 11, 2012, the Court sentenced the defendant to thirty-seven (37) months confinement, three (3) years supervised release with special conditions, a $200 assessment, and restitution in the amount of $320,266.70 (Doc. No. 132). A copy of the Judgment is appended hereto as Exhibit A.
At the time of sentencing, the United States moved the Court to append to the judgment a "Restitution List," wliich listed the proposed recipients of restitution and loss amounts. However, the list of victims was not included with the judgment. A copy of the Restitution List is appended hereto as Exhibit B, which accurately reflects the United States' calculation for each restitution recipient.
Thus, the United States is respectfully requesting that the Court:
(1) append the Restitution list to the Judgment.
The United States believes this was simply a clerical error that the Court has discretion to correct pursuant to Rule 36.
Respectfully Submitted,
DANIEL G. BOGDEN
United States Attorney
DENIS Jf McINERNEY
Chief
U.S. Department of Justice
Criminal Division, Fraud Section
BRIAN YOUNG
MARY ANN McCARTHY
Trial Attorneys
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT B
