White v. Madden, 8:19-cv-01441-PA (JDE). (2020)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20200106522
Visitors: 23
Filed: Jan. 02, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 02, 2020
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE PERCY ANDERSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the records and files herein, including the Petition, the Answer, the Traverse, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No party filed timely objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court accordingly accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE PERCY ANDERSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the records and files herein, including the Petition, the Answer, the Traverse, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No party filed timely objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court accordingly accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED ..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
PERCY ANDERSON, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the records and files herein, including the Petition, the Answer, the Traverse, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No party filed timely objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court accordingly accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1. Petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing is denied; and
2. Judgment shall be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
