Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Terry, CR 14-00305 JST. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180611601 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 08, 2018
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE TO JULY 27, 2018 AND [PROPOSED] ORDER JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . The above-captioned supervised release violation matter is set on June 15, 2018 before this Court for a status conference. The parties request that the Court continue the hearing to July 27, 2018. The parties agree to the continuance because the United States is still in the process of evaluating whether new federal charges will be brought against the defendant. The Federal Bu
More

STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE TO JULY 27, 2018 AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

The above-captioned supervised release violation matter is set on June 15, 2018 before this Court for a status conference. The parties request that the Court continue the hearing to July 27, 2018. The parties agree to the continuance because the United States is still in the process of evaluating whether new federal charges will be brought against the defendant. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)'s national laboratory processed the semi-automatic pistol, magazine, and bullets seized from the vehicle Terry was driving for the presence of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and located a sufficient amount of DNA for comparison testing. In April, the government obtained a search warrant to obtain a genetic sample from Terry to compare to the DNA obtained from the pistol. The FBI laboratory is still performing the analysis and comparison of DNA obtained from the pistol to the genetic reference sample obtained from Terry.

Because this matter concerns a supervised release violation, there is no time exclusion necessary under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161. The assigned United States Probation Officer, Lavonne Marzette, does not object to the continuance, and has indicated that she believes the current conditions of release are sufficient.

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Based on the reasons provided in the stipulation of the parties above, the Court hereby CONTINUES the case to July 27, 2018.

IT SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer