Herrera v. Sanchez, 1:17-cv-01303-LJO-EGP. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181211765
Visitors: 2
Filed: Dec. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 10, 2018
Summary: JOINT APPLICATION AND STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION PURSUANT TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT; ORDER LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . The parties hereby apply for and stipulate to issuance of an order dismissing this action pursuant to the recent settlement agreement entered by the parties. The parties request that the Court retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcement only. A proposed order of dismissal follows, and is also emailed to the Court, pursuant to Local Rule 137(b
Summary: JOINT APPLICATION AND STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION PURSUANT TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT; ORDER LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . The parties hereby apply for and stipulate to issuance of an order dismissing this action pursuant to the recent settlement agreement entered by the parties. The parties request that the Court retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcement only. A proposed order of dismissal follows, and is also emailed to the Court, pursuant to Local Rule 137(b)..
More
JOINT APPLICATION AND STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION PURSUANT TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT; ORDER
LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, Chief District Judge.
The parties hereby apply for and stipulate to issuance of an order dismissing this action pursuant to the recent settlement agreement entered by the parties. The parties request that the Court retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcement only. A proposed order of dismissal follows, and is also emailed to the Court, pursuant to Local Rule 137(b).
So stipulated.
PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, this case is hereby dismissed with prejudice. The Court retains jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing the terms of the Settlement Agreement entered by the parties.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
