STANDEN v. COLVIN, 2:16-cv-01267-EFB. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20170118a97
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 17, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 17, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION FOR FIRST 30 DAY EXTENSION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Plaintiff to file his Motion for Summary Judgment/Remand be extended thirty (30) days until February 16, 2017. This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension of time. Plaintiff's counsel is unable to prepare Plaintiff's opening brief in accordance with the current sche
Summary: STIPULATION FOR FIRST 30 DAY EXTENSION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Plaintiff to file his Motion for Summary Judgment/Remand be extended thirty (30) days until February 16, 2017. This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension of time. Plaintiff's counsel is unable to prepare Plaintiff's opening brief in accordance with the current sched..
More
STIPULATION FOR FIRST 30 DAY EXTENSION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF
EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Plaintiff to file his Motion for Summary Judgment/Remand be extended thirty (30) days until February 16, 2017. This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension of time. Plaintiff's counsel is unable to prepare Plaintiff's opening brief in accordance with the current scheduling order due to counsel's current workload which currently involves an ongoing jury trial in San Joaquin County Superior Court that is expected to last through January 27, 2017.
SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
