Gleason v. Placencia, 1:19-cv-00539-LJO-EPG (PC). (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20200117c16
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 16, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 16, 2020
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE AS MOOT (ECF NO. 41) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Thomas Gleason ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On January 14, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion to substitute G. Placencia in place of defendant John Doe. (ECF No. 41). As Plaintiff already filed an amended complaint naming G. Placencia as the defendant instead of John Doe (ECF No. 27)
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE AS MOOT (ECF NO. 41) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Thomas Gleason ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On January 14, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion to substitute G. Placencia in place of defendant John Doe. (ECF No. 41). As Plaintiff already filed an amended complaint naming G. Placencia as the defendant instead of John Doe (ECF No. 27),..
More
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE AS MOOT
(ECF NO. 41)
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
Thomas Gleason ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 14, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion to substitute G. Placencia in place of defendant John Doe. (ECF No. 41). As Plaintiff already filed an amended complaint naming G. Placencia as the defendant instead of John Doe (ECF No. 27), there is no need to substitute G. Placencia into the case.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to substitute is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
