Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Johansen v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, 17-452-MN-SRF. (2020)

Court: District Court, D. Delaware Number: infdco20200302503 Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 26, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 26, 2020
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION FOR ORDER OF DISMISSAL SHERRY R. FALLON , Magistrate Judge . WHEREFORE, on January 23, 2019 and January 25, 2019, the court issued Reports and Recommendations which recommended granting moving defendants' motions for summary judgment 1 (D.I. 183; D.I. 184); WHEREFORE, on February 7, 2019 and February 11, 2019, District Judge Noreika adopted the Reports and Recommendations granting the moving defendants' motions for summary judgment (D.I. 185; D.I. 200); WHEREFO
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION FOR ORDER OF DISMISSAL

WHEREFORE, on January 23, 2019 and January 25, 2019, the court issued Reports and Recommendations which recommended granting moving defendants' motions for summary judgment1 (D.I. 183; D.I. 184);

WHEREFORE, on February 7, 2019 and February 11, 2019, District Judge Noreika adopted the Reports and Recommendations granting the moving defendants' motions for summary judgment (D.I. 185; D.I. 200);

WHEREFORE, on February 13, 2020 and February 18, 2020, three of the four remaining defendants were dismissed by the court (D.I. 211; D.I. 214; D.I. 215);

WHEREFORE, The Fairbanks Company is the only defendant remaining on the docket;

WHEREFORE, The Fairbanks Company filed a notice of bankruptcy and stay of proceedings on August 1, 2018 (D.I. 158);

WHEREFORE, the court ordered that, on or before February 25, 2020, plaintiff was to show cause why the Complaint should not be dismissed with prejudice as to the remaining defendant, The Fairbanks Company (D.I. 216); and

WHEREFORE, plaintiff has not filed a response to the Order to Show Cause to date.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED THAT the Complaint should be dismissed with prejudice as to the remaining defendant, The Fairbanks Company, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute claims against the remaining defendant and failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause.

FootNotes


1. The moving defendants were as follows: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Anchor/Darling Valve Company, Atwood & Morrill Co., Armstrong International, Inc., Crosby Valve LLC, Flowserve U.S., Inc., FMC Corporation, Gardner Denver, Inc., Jenkins Bros., Kunkle Industries, Inc., Nash Engineering Holdings LLC, Neles-Jamesbury, Inc., Red-White Valve Corp., Warren Pumps, LLC, and Ford Motor Company. (D.I. 138; D.I. 141; D.I. 143; D.I. 145; D.I. 147; D.I. 149; D.I. 151; D.I. 154; D.I. 156; D.I. 159; D.I. 161; D.I. 163; D.I. 165; D.I. 167; D.I. 169).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer