Ray Capital Inc. v. M/V Newlead Castellano, CV416-093. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20160520a95
Visitors: 13
Filed: May 19, 2016
Latest Update: May 19, 2016
Summary: ORDER G.R. SMITH , Magistrate Judge . The Court having reviewed and considered the petitions of Neil A. Quartaro and Zachary J. Farley of the law firm of Watson Farley & Williams LLP, 250 West 55th Street, New York, New York 10019, for permission to appear pro hac vice on behalf of plaintiffs Ray Capital Inc. et al., in the above-captioned case, Said request is hereby GRANTED and the Clerk is DIRECTED to enter Neil A. Quartaro and Zachary J. Farley as counsel of record for plaintiffs Ray
Summary: ORDER G.R. SMITH , Magistrate Judge . The Court having reviewed and considered the petitions of Neil A. Quartaro and Zachary J. Farley of the law firm of Watson Farley & Williams LLP, 250 West 55th Street, New York, New York 10019, for permission to appear pro hac vice on behalf of plaintiffs Ray Capital Inc. et al., in the above-captioned case, Said request is hereby GRANTED and the Clerk is DIRECTED to enter Neil A. Quartaro and Zachary J. Farley as counsel of record for plaintiffs Ray C..
More
ORDER
G.R. SMITH, Magistrate Judge.
The Court having reviewed and considered the petitions of Neil A. Quartaro and Zachary J. Farley of the law firm of Watson Farley & Williams LLP, 250 West 55th Street, New York, New York 10019, for permission to appear pro hac vice on behalf of plaintiffs Ray Capital Inc. et al., in the above-captioned case,
Said request is hereby GRANTED and the Clerk is DIRECTED to enter Neil A. Quartaro and Zachary J. Farley as counsel of record for plaintiffs Ray Capital Inc. et al., in this case.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
