Filed: May 12, 2016
Latest Update: May 12, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE A REPLY TO PENGILLY'S AMENDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Plaintiff JAMES W. PENGILLY, Counterdefendant JAMES W. PENGILLY and Counterdefendant AMANDA M. PENGILLY (together "Pengilly"), by and through their attorneys, PENGILLY LAW FIRM , NEVADA ASSOCIATION SERVICES, INC., a Nevada corporation; MARK A. STUHMER, a Nevada resident; DOUGLAS L. CROOK, a Nevada resid
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE A REPLY TO PENGILLY'S AMENDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Plaintiff JAMES W. PENGILLY, Counterdefendant JAMES W. PENGILLY and Counterdefendant AMANDA M. PENGILLY (together "Pengilly"), by and through their attorneys, PENGILLY LAW FIRM , NEVADA ASSOCIATION SERVICES, INC., a Nevada corporation; MARK A. STUHMER, a Nevada resident; DOUGLAS L. CROOK, a Nevada reside..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE A REPLY TO PENGILLY'S AMENDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, District Judge.
Plaintiff JAMES W. PENGILLY, Counterdefendant JAMES W. PENGILLY and Counterdefendant AMANDA M. PENGILLY (together "Pengilly"), by and through their attorneys, PENGILLY LAW FIRM, NEVADA ASSOCIATION SERVICES, INC., a Nevada corporation; MARK A. STUHMER, a Nevada resident; DOUGLAS L. CROOK, a Nevada resident; BILL BLANCHARD, a Nevada resident; KENNETH R. SAILLEY, a Nevada resident; ERIKA GEISER, by and through their counsel of record, Leach Johnson Song & Gruchow, and KE ALOHA HOLDINGS, LLC, by and through its counsel of record Greene Infuso, LLP hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Plaintiff to file his Reply to his Amended Motion for Summary Judgment for one week to May 16, 2016. (ECF # 97 & 103.) Additionally, the parties agree to extend the time for Defendants to file a Reply to their Motion for Summary Judgment to May 16, 2016. (ECF # 100.)
ORDER ON STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE A REPLY TO PENGILLY'S AMENDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
IT IS SO ORDERED.
