SIBLEY v. McCONNELL, 15-730 (JEB). (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Columbia
Number: infdco20151015931
Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 13, 2015
Summary: ORDER JAMES E. BOASBERG , District Judge . For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the Court ORDERS that: 1. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint is DENIED; and 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions is DENIED; and 3. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; and 4. Plaintiff's Second Motion for Remand is GRANTED; and 5. The case is REMANDED to D.C. Superior Court. IT IS SO ORDERED.
ORDER
JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge.
For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the Court ORDERS that:
1. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint is DENIED; and
2. Plaintiff's Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions is DENIED; and
3. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; and
4. Plaintiff's Second Motion for Remand is GRANTED; and
5. The case is REMANDED to D.C. Superior Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
