Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ARROWOOD INDEMNITY COMPANY v. BEL AIR MART, 2:11-CV-00976-JAM-DAD. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20151005a14 Visitors: 20
Filed: Oct. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 02, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF THE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE [Fed.R.Civ.P. 41] JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff/counterdefendant Arrowood Indemnity Company, formerly known as Royal Indemnity Company, as successor to Globe Indemnity Company ("Arrowood") and defendant/counterclaimant Bel Air Mart, by and through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, all claims involving defendants R. Ge
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF THE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE [Fed.R.Civ.P. 41]

Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff/counterdefendant Arrowood Indemnity Company, formerly known as Royal Indemnity Company, as successor to Globe Indemnity Company ("Arrowood") and defendant/counterclaimant Bel Air Mart, by and through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, all claims involving defendants R. Gern Nagler, as Trustee of the John W. Burns Testimentary Trust, and Robert Gern Nagler, individually, were dismissed with prejudice on January 16, 2015;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT the remaining entirety of the action, including all claims by Arrowood and Bel Air Mart, be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Having reviewed the Stipulation set forth above, the Court hereby adopts the terms set forth therein by way of this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer