ROEMER v. CAROCHI, 14-cv-01655-BNB. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20141003829
Visitors: 34
Filed: Sep. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 30, 2014
Summary: ORDER BOYD N. BOLAND, Magistrate Judge. Pending are: (1) Defendants' Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) [Doc. # 16, filed 9/9/2014] (the "Motion to Stay"); and (2) Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Rule 29(a)(1) Initial Disclosures [Doc. # 17, filed 9/9/2014] (the "Motion for Extension"). I held a hearing on the motions this afternoon and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here.
Summary: ORDER BOYD N. BOLAND, Magistrate Judge. Pending are: (1) Defendants' Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) [Doc. # 16, filed 9/9/2014] (the "Motion to Stay"); and (2) Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Rule 29(a)(1) Initial Disclosures [Doc. # 17, filed 9/9/2014] (the "Motion for Extension"). I held a hearing on the motions this afternoon and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here. ..
More
ORDER
BOYD N. BOLAND, Magistrate Judge.
Pending are:
(1) Defendants' Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) [Doc. # 16, filed 9/9/2014] (the "Motion to Stay"); and
(2) Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Rule 29(a)(1) Initial Disclosures [Doc. # 17, filed 9/9/2014] (the "Motion for Extension").
I held a hearing on the motions this afternoon and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here.
IT IS ORDERED:
(1) The Motion to Stay [Doc. # 16] is GRANTED. Disclosure and discovery obligations are stayed pending a ruling on the defendants' Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) [Doc. # 15].
(2) Within ten days after a ruling on the Motion to Dismiss, the plaintiffs shall file a status report notifying me of the ruling, its apparent impact on the case, and whether additional pretrial proceedings are necessary.
(3) The Motion for Extension [Doc. # 17] is DENIED as moot in view of the stay of disclosure and discovery requirements.
Source: Leagle
