Attigui v. Tahoe Resources, Inc, 2:17-cv-01868-RFB-NJK. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20171204c65
Visitors: 23
Filed: Dec. 01, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 01, 2017
Summary: ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is Defendants' motion to extend the deadline to respond to the complaint pending other events, including transfer, consolidation, and appointment of lead counsel and lead Plaintiff. Docket No. 35. Although he disagrees with certain aspects of that filing, proposed lead Plaintiff Nguyen does not oppose the extension. Docket No. 39. No other response was filed, and the deadline for doing so has passed. See Docket No. 37. For
Summary: ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is Defendants' motion to extend the deadline to respond to the complaint pending other events, including transfer, consolidation, and appointment of lead counsel and lead Plaintiff. Docket No. 35. Although he disagrees with certain aspects of that filing, proposed lead Plaintiff Nguyen does not oppose the extension. Docket No. 39. No other response was filed, and the deadline for doing so has passed. See Docket No. 37. For ..
More
ORDER
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendants' motion to extend the deadline to respond to the complaint pending other events, including transfer, consolidation, and appointment of lead counsel and lead Plaintiff. Docket No. 35. Although he disagrees with certain aspects of that filing, proposed lead Plaintiff Nguyen does not oppose the extension. Docket No. 39. No other response was filed, and the deadline for doing so has passed. See Docket No. 37. For good cause shown, the Court GRANTS the motion in part. Rather than extending the subject deadline based on when other events will occur, the Court instead EXTENDS the deadline for Defendants to respond to the complaint to January 26, 2018. To the extent any party believes it proper to do so based on the circumstances existing at that time, it may seek a further extension of the deadline.1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The Court expresses no opinion herein whether such request will be granted.
Source: Leagle
