PENN-MONT BENEFIT SERVICES v. U.S., 13-4130. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20150821g89
Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 20, 2015
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE F. STENGEL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 20th day of August, 2015, upon consideration of the Government's motion for default judgment as to U.S.'s counterclaim (Doc. No. 27), it is hereby ORDERED that the Government's motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as explained in the accompanying memorandum. 1 Judgment on the Government's counterclaim is entered in favor of the Government, and against Penn-Mont Benefit Services, on the issue of liability. The Gover
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE F. STENGEL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 20th day of August, 2015, upon consideration of the Government's motion for default judgment as to U.S.'s counterclaim (Doc. No. 27), it is hereby ORDERED that the Government's motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as explained in the accompanying memorandum. 1 Judgment on the Government's counterclaim is entered in favor of the Government, and against Penn-Mont Benefit Services, on the issue of liability. The Govern..
More
ORDER
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 20th day of August, 2015, upon consideration of the Government's motion for default judgment as to U.S.'s counterclaim (Doc. No. 27), it is hereby ORDERED that the Government's motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as explained in the accompanying memorandum.1 Judgment on the Government's counterclaim is entered in favor of the Government, and against Penn-Mont Benefit Services, on the issue of liability. The Government's motion for default judgment regarding the issues of damages is DENIED without prejudice.
FootNotes
1. I entered an Order for Penn-Mont to show cause on September 11, 2014. Doc. No. 31. Penn-Mont has not responded to this Order or the Government's motion.
Source: Leagle
