BURNS v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, 12-1903. (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20130107057
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 07, 2013
Latest Update: Jan. 07, 2013
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Raymond S. Burns, Jr. appeals the district court's order granting the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority's motion for summary judgment on his negligence complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Burns v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., No. 1:12-cv-00123-CMH-TRJ (E.D. Va. July 13, 2012). We dispense with oral
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Raymond S. Burns, Jr. appeals the district court's order granting the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority's motion for summary judgment on his negligence complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Burns v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., No. 1:12-cv-00123-CMH-TRJ (E.D. Va. July 13, 2012). We dispense with oral a..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Raymond S. Burns, Jr. appeals the district court's order granting the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority's motion for summary judgment on his negligence complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Burns v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., No. 1:12-cv-00123-CMH-TRJ (E.D. Va. July 13, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
