U.S. EX REL. BOISE v. CEPHALON, INC., 08-287. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20141010a89
Visitors: 3
Filed: Oct. 09, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 09, 2014
Summary: ORDER THOMAS N. O'NEILL, Jr., District Judge. AND NOW, this 9th day of October, 2014, upon consideration of the motion to dismiss by defendant Cephalon, Inc. (Dkt. No. 78) and plaintiffs' response (Dkt. No. 89), and consistent with the accompanying memorandum of law, it is ordered that Cephalon's motion is DENIED with regard to the Fentora and Nuvigil claims of Augustine and Dufour and STAYED with regard to plaintiffs' Provigil claims pending the resolution of U.S. ex rel. Carter v. Hallibur
Summary: ORDER THOMAS N. O'NEILL, Jr., District Judge. AND NOW, this 9th day of October, 2014, upon consideration of the motion to dismiss by defendant Cephalon, Inc. (Dkt. No. 78) and plaintiffs' response (Dkt. No. 89), and consistent with the accompanying memorandum of law, it is ordered that Cephalon's motion is DENIED with regard to the Fentora and Nuvigil claims of Augustine and Dufour and STAYED with regard to plaintiffs' Provigil claims pending the resolution of U.S. ex rel. Carter v. Halliburt..
More
ORDER
THOMAS N. O'NEILL, Jr., District Judge.
AND NOW, this 9th day of October, 2014, upon consideration of the motion to dismiss by defendant Cephalon, Inc. (Dkt. No. 78) and plaintiffs' response (Dkt. No. 89), and consistent with the accompanying memorandum of law, it is ordered that Cephalon's motion is DENIED with regard to the Fentora and Nuvigil claims of Augustine and Dufour and STAYED with regard to plaintiffs' Provigil claims pending the resolution of U.S. ex rel. Carter v. Halliburton Co., 710 F.3d 171 (4th Cir. 2013), cert. granted, 134 S.Ct. 2899 (2014). The parties are directed to advise me promptly of the Supreme Court's final decision in that matter.
Source: Leagle
