Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

(PS) Towers v. County of San Joaquin, 2:17-cv-02597-JAM-KJN (PS). (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180205990 Visitors: 16
Filed: Feb. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 02, 2018
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, who proceeds pro se, has requested permission to utilize the court's electronic filing system. (ECF No. 10.) Local Rule 133 provides that "[a]ny person appearing pro se may not utilize electronic filing except with the permission of the assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge.. . . All pro se parties shall file and serve paper documents as required by applicable Federal Rules of Civil or Criminal Procedure or by these Rules." E.D. Cal. L.R.
More

ORDER

Plaintiff, who proceeds pro se, has requested permission to utilize the court's electronic filing system. (ECF No. 10.) Local Rule 133 provides that "[a]ny person appearing pro se may not utilize electronic filing except with the permission of the assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge.. . . All pro se parties shall file and serve paper documents as required by applicable Federal Rules of Civil or Criminal Procedure or by these Rules." E.D. Cal. L.R. 133(b)(2). Here, plaintiff's request does not set forth a compelling reason why the court should deviate from the Local Rules and its standard practice of disallowing the use of electronic filing by pro se litigants. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion to utilize the electronic filing system (ECF No. 10) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer