Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MOK v. OPTUM, CV 13-04577 RS. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140428a21 Visitors: 19
Filed: Apr. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 25, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. Plaintiff Grace Mok ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Optum, Inc. and United HealthCare Services, Inc. ("Defendants"), by and through their counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. On February 10, 2014, the Court entered an order compelling this matter to arbitration. (ECF No. 35.) The Court's order stated, "If the matter is resolved by settlement, or in the event Mok elects not to pursue arbitration, she shall pr
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

Plaintiff Grace Mok ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Optum, Inc. and United HealthCare Services, Inc. ("Defendants"), by and through their counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. On February 10, 2014, the Court entered an order compelling this matter to arbitration. (ECF No. 35.) The Court's order stated, "If the matter is resolved by settlement, or in the event Mok elects not to pursue arbitration, she shall promptly file a dismissal of the action. (Id. at p. 10.)

2. The parties have reached an agreement to resolve this matter.

3. The above-captioned action shall be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; and

4. None of the parties will seek a court award for attorneys' fees and costs.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation and good cause appearing, this action is dismissed with prejudice. Neither party shall seek a court award of attorneys' fees and costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer