Filed: Nov. 05, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 05, 2014
Summary: ORDER BOYD N. BOLAND, Magistrate Judge. This matter arises on the following: (1) Motion and Affidavit to Issue Subpoena to Produce Per Rule 45(a)(2)(C) [Doc. #39, filed 03/12/2014]; (2) Motion to Stay Proceedings of Defendants Detective Jared Dennis, Deputy Cornell, and Sheriff John Minor [Doc. #48, filed 04/03/2014]; (3) Motion for Leave from the Court to File a Sur-Reply [Doc. #67, filed 05/07/2014]; and (4) Motion for Leave from the Court to File a Sur-Reply [Doc. #71, filed 05/
Summary: ORDER BOYD N. BOLAND, Magistrate Judge. This matter arises on the following: (1) Motion and Affidavit to Issue Subpoena to Produce Per Rule 45(a)(2)(C) [Doc. #39, filed 03/12/2014]; (2) Motion to Stay Proceedings of Defendants Detective Jared Dennis, Deputy Cornell, and Sheriff John Minor [Doc. #48, filed 04/03/2014]; (3) Motion for Leave from the Court to File a Sur-Reply [Doc. #67, filed 05/07/2014]; and (4) Motion for Leave from the Court to File a Sur-Reply [Doc. #71, filed 05/1..
More
ORDER
BOYD N. BOLAND, Magistrate Judge.
This matter arises on the following:
(1) Motion and Affidavit to Issue Subpoena to Produce Per Rule 45(a)(2)(C) [Doc. #39, filed 03/12/2014];
(2) Motion to Stay Proceedings of Defendants Detective Jared Dennis, Deputy Cornell, and Sheriff John Minor [Doc. #48, filed 04/03/2014];
(3) Motion for Leave from the Court to File a Sur-Reply [Doc. #67, filed 05/07/2014]; and
(4) Motion for Leave from the Court to File a Sur-Reply [Doc. #71, filed 05/19/2014].
The plaintiff requests that the court issue subpoenas for witnesses to be present "pre-trial and at trial." She also seeks leave to file a sur-reply to the defendants' motion to dismiss in order to address arguments and exhibits presented by the defendants' reply brief. The defendants seek a stay of the case pending resolution of their motion to dismiss.
Separately, I have recommended that the plaintiff's Amended Complaint be dismissed. The recommendation does not rely on the arguments or exhibits at issue in the plaintiff's motions to file a sur-reply.
IT IS ORDERED that the Motions [Docs. ## 39, 48, 67, and 71] are DENIED AS MOOT.
