Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

GREENMARC, LLC v. IFFLA, C 12-6490 SI. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130624734 Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 27, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 27, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION 1. WAIVER OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT AND 2. EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT AND 3. SET SCHEDULE LEADING TO INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge. Plaintiff, GREENMARC, LLC, Mark Green, Manager Member, and Defendants, JOSEPH B. IFFLA, individually and dba PERFORMEX MACHINING COMPANY, and PERFORMEX MACHINING, INC., and CARL R. HEINEMANN, individually, by and through their attorneys, and Defendants HOFFMAN METAL PRODUCTS, INC., an
More

STIPULATION

1. WAIVER OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT

AND

2. EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

AND

3. SET SCHEDULE LEADING TO INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.

Plaintiff, GREENMARC, LLC, Mark Green, Manager Member, and Defendants, JOSEPH B. IFFLA, individually and dba PERFORMEX MACHINING COMPANY, and PERFORMEX MACHINING, INC., and CARL R. HEINEMANN, individually, by and through their attorneys, and Defendants HOFFMAN METAL PRODUCTS, INC., and HARRY W. HOFFMAN, individually and as an officer, director and owner of HOFFMAN METAL PRODUCTS, INC., on behalf of themselves, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. Each of the above-named Defendants waives service of the Summons and Complaint and other papers required to accompany the Summons and Complaint, and acknowledges their receipt;

2. The time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be extended to and including May 28, 2013; and

3. The last day to meet and confer re: initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan, to file ADR Certification signed by Parties and Counsel, and to file either a Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of need for an ADR Phone Conference, shall be April 19, 2013;

4. The last day to file the Rule 26(f) Report, complete initial disclosures or state objection in the Rule 26(f) Report and file the Case Management Statement per the Standing Order, shall be May 3, 2013.

5. Pursuant to Rule 16(b), F.R.Civ.P., and Civil L.R. 16-10, a Case Management Conference, currently scheduled for April 19, 2013, instead will be held in this case before the Honorable Susan Illston on May 10, 2013, at 2:30 p.m. in Courtroom No. 10, 19th floor Federal Building.

6. The reason for these extensions is to allow the parties to collect more information in the case, as one defendant has only recently retained counsel and a second defendant has not yet retained counsel. It will also allow the parties to have discussions to try to settle the case. Counsel is advised that defendant ASCO CORPORATION, as a dissolved California corporation, is not represented, and it may submit no answer or otherwise respond to the complaint.

7. The terms of the Case Management Conference Order filed February 28, 2013, will otherwise remain in effect.

Subject to the rescheduling of the date of the Case Management Conference in paragraph 5 above, as of the time this stipulation is entered into, the change in time to answer or otherwise respond will not alter the date for any hearing or deadline set by the court of which the attorneys for any of the Parties are aware.

HOFFMAN METAL PRODUCTS, INC., by ____________________________________ Harry W. Hoffman, Officer, Director and Owner HARRY W. HOFFMAN, individually. by ____________________________________ Harry W. Hoffman

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer