Filed: Feb. 26, 2013
Latest Update: Feb. 26, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION TO ENLARGE PLAINTIFFS' TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT SAUNDRA J. ARMSTRONG, District Judge. Whereas, on January 14, 2013, Plaintiffs, Gregory L. Raifman and Susan Raifman, husband and wife, individually and on behalf of their marital community and as Trustees of The Raifman Family Revocable Intervivos Trust, as beneficiaries of The Palladian Trust, as sole members of Gekko Holdings, Ltd., and assignees in interest and
Summary: STIPULATION TO ENLARGE PLAINTIFFS' TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT SAUNDRA J. ARMSTRONG, District Judge. Whereas, on January 14, 2013, Plaintiffs, Gregory L. Raifman and Susan Raifman, husband and wife, individually and on behalf of their marital community and as Trustees of The Raifman Family Revocable Intervivos Trust, as beneficiaries of The Palladian Trust, as sole members of Gekko Holdings, Ltd., and assignees in interest and b..
More
STIPULATION TO ENLARGE PLAINTIFFS' TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
SAUNDRA J. ARMSTRONG, District Judge.
Whereas, on January 14, 2013, Plaintiffs, Gregory L. Raifman and Susan Raifman, husband and wife, individually and on behalf of their marital community and as Trustees of The Raifman Family Revocable Intervivos Trust, as beneficiaries of The Palladian Trust, as sole members of Gekko Holdings, Ltd., and assignees in interest and beneficial owners of Helicon Investments, Ltd. (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), filed their Motion for Leave to File a Proposed Second Amended Complaint ("Motion") in this action;
Whereas, Plaintiffs' Reply in support of the Motion is due on February 26, 2013; and
Whereas, on February 21, 2013, the parties, by and through their respective counsel, entered a stipulation agreeing to enlarge Plaintiffs' time to file a Reply until March 1, 2013.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, through their counsel, hereby stipulate and agree, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), that Plaintiffs shall have until March 1, 2013, to file their Reply in support of said Motion. This extension will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court Order.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
