BEALS v. COLVIN, 2:16-cv-00008-CKD. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160722f50
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 21, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION FOR FIRST 30 DAY EXTENSION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Plaintiff to file his Motion for Summary Judgment/Remand be extended thirty (30) days until August 18, 2016. This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension of time. Despite due diligence, Plaintiff's counsel has been unable to prepare Plaintiff's opening brief in acco
Summary: STIPULATION FOR FIRST 30 DAY EXTENSION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Plaintiff to file his Motion for Summary Judgment/Remand be extended thirty (30) days until August 18, 2016. This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension of time. Despite due diligence, Plaintiff's counsel has been unable to prepare Plaintiff's opening brief in accor..
More
STIPULATION FOR FIRST 30 DAY EXTENSION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF
CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Plaintiff to file his Motion for Summary Judgment/Remand be extended thirty (30) days until August 18, 2016. This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension of time. Despite due diligence, Plaintiff's counsel has been unable to prepare Plaintiff's opening brief in accordance with the current scheduling order due to counsel's current workload which has involved conflicting deadlines in unrelated matters.
SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
