Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

USA v. Lucero, 16-cr-00107-HSG-1. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180201a90 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 31, 2018
Summary: ORDER REGARDING MOTION IN LIMINE TO ENFORCE COURT'S ORDER EXCLUDING EVIDENCE PRODUCED AFTER DISCOVERY DEADLINE Re: Dkt. No. 124 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . The Court DENIES Defendant's motion in limine regarding enforcement of the Court's prior discovery deadline as to: (1) Government witness Daniel Miller; (2) Government exhibits 4 through 16 and 19, pertaining to records and other materials; and (3) Government exhibit 1032, pertaining to a padlock and link. See Dkt.
More

ORDER REGARDING MOTION IN LIMINE TO ENFORCE COURT'S ORDER EXCLUDING EVIDENCE PRODUCED AFTER DISCOVERY DEADLINE

Re: Dkt. No. 124

The Court DENIES Defendant's motion in limine regarding enforcement of the Court's prior discovery deadline as to: (1) Government witness Daniel Miller; (2) Government exhibits 4 through 16 and 19, pertaining to records and other materials; and (3) Government exhibit 1032, pertaining to a padlock and link. See Dkt. No. 124 at 2-4, 5. The Government does not oppose Defendant's request to exclude the other exhibits listed in Defendant's motion, i.e., Government exhibits 398 through 411, 829 through 863, 888, and NOAA and USGS materials. See id. at 4-6; Dkt. No. 127. Defendant's motion is therefore GRANTED as to those exhibits.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer