Dixon v. Berryhill, 4:18-cv-03483-HSG. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20181210b45
Visitors: 11
Filed: Dec. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 07, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective counsel of record, with the Court's approval, that Defendant shall have a 45-day extension of time, from December 13, 2018 to January 27, 2019, for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. All other dates in the Court's Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly. This is Defendant's first request fo
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective counsel of record, with the Court's approval, that Defendant shall have a 45-day extension of time, from December 13, 2018 to January 27, 2019, for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. All other dates in the Court's Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly. This is Defendant's first request for..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective counsel of record, with the Court's approval, that Defendant shall have a 45-day extension of time, from December 13, 2018 to January 27, 2019, for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. All other dates in the Court's Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly.
This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time. Defendant respectfully submits that good cause exists for the requested extension because Defendant's counsel was out of the office unexpectedly and requires additional time to complete her review and analysis of the record and the issues raised in Plaintiff's motion, to determine whether options exist for settlement, and to prepare Defendant's response if settlement is not possible. Defendant's counsel also has a number of other briefs due as well as an imminent hearing, and requires additional time to manage competing workload demands. This request is made in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. Plaintiff does not oppose the requested extension.
ORDER
Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
