EON CORP. IP HOLDINGS, LLC v. LANDIS+GYR INC., 6:11-cv-317-LED-JDL. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20130911c21
Visitors: 19
Filed: Sep. 09, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 09, 2013
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE LEONARD DAVIS, District Judge. The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge has been presented for consideration (Doc. No. 366). The Magistrate Judge recommends denying Defendants' 1 Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Indefiniteness (Doc. No. 340). No objections have
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE LEONARD DAVIS, District Judge. The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge has been presented for consideration (Doc. No. 366). The Magistrate Judge recommends denying Defendants' 1 Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Indefiniteness (Doc. No. 340). No objections have ..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
LEONARD DAVIS, District Judge.
The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge has been presented for consideration (Doc. No. 366). The Magistrate Judge recommends denying Defendants'1 Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Indefiniteness (Doc. No. 340). No objections have been filed. Having carefully considered the parties' arguments, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings of this Court.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment be DENIED.
So ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The only remaining moving Defendant is Silver Spring Networks, Inc. Originally, the moving Defendants were Elster Solutions, LLC, EnergyICT, Inc., Elster Amco Water, LLC, Itron, Inc., Landis+Gyr Inc., Silver Spring Networks, Inc., and Trilliant Networks, Inc. (collectively "Defendants").
Source: Leagle
