Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Sarina King v. Nancy A. Berryhill, 4:16-cv-06643-KAW. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20171212884 Visitors: 2
Filed: Dec. 11, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 11, 2017
Summary: ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Re: Dkt. No. 13 KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff commenced this social security action on November 16, 2016. (Dkt. No. 1.) On November 16, 2016, the court issued a scheduling order requiring Plaintiff to file a motion for summary judgment or motion for remand within 28 days of being served with Defendant's answer. (Dkt. No. 4.) The answer and administrative record were filed on May 8, 2017. (Dkt. Nos. 11 & 12.) Thus, Plaintiff's motion
More

ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Re: Dkt. No. 13

Plaintiff commenced this social security action on November 16, 2016. (Dkt. No. 1.) On November 16, 2016, the court issued a scheduling order requiring Plaintiff to file a motion for summary judgment or motion for remand within 28 days of being served with Defendant's answer. (Dkt. No. 4.) The answer and administrative record were filed on May 8, 2017. (Dkt. Nos. 11 & 12.) Thus, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment or motion for remand was due by June 5, 2017. Plaintiff did not timely file a motion for summary judgment or motion for remand, nor did she seek relief from the deadline.

On September 19, 2017, the Court issued an order directing Plaintiff to show cause, by no later than October 3, 2017, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the deadline to file the motion for summary judgment or seek relief from the procedural order deadline, and to file a motion for summary judgment or motion for remand. (Dkt. No. 13.) Plaintiff was advised that the failure to file both documents may result in the case being dismissed for failure to prosecute. Id.

On September 19, 2017, Plaintiff's counsel responded, and both apologized and informed the court that she had been dealing with deaths and extended illnesses in her family, but that was not an excuse for not seeking a timely extension. (Dkt. No. 14.) She later asked for a brief extension of time to file the motion for summary judgment, which was granted. (Dkt. Nos. 15 & 17.) On October 11, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. No. 18.) The Court notes that Plaintiff's reply brief, filed on November 20, 2017, was timely filed. (See Dkt. No. 20.)

In light of the foregoing, the order to show cause is DISCHARGED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer