Filed: Jun. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 07, 2016
Summary: SAN JOSE DIVISION STIPULATED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES REGARDING DEFENDANTS' PENDING MOTION TO DISMISS, AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, and ORDER NATHANAEL COUSINS , Magistrate Judge . Whereas Plaintiff's counsel have requested, and Defendants agree, to a two-week extension of time for Plaintiff to file his Opposition to Defendants' pending Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. Entry 103); and Whereas Defendants therefore request and Plaintiff agrees, to a two-week extension of time to file Def
Summary: SAN JOSE DIVISION STIPULATED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES REGARDING DEFENDANTS' PENDING MOTION TO DISMISS, AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, and ORDER NATHANAEL COUSINS , Magistrate Judge . Whereas Plaintiff's counsel have requested, and Defendants agree, to a two-week extension of time for Plaintiff to file his Opposition to Defendants' pending Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. Entry 103); and Whereas Defendants therefore request and Plaintiff agrees, to a two-week extension of time to file Defe..
More
SAN JOSE DIVISION STIPULATED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES REGARDING DEFENDANTS' PENDING MOTION TO DISMISS, AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, and ORDER
NATHANAEL COUSINS, Magistrate Judge.
Whereas Plaintiff's counsel have requested, and Defendants agree, to a two-week extension of time for Plaintiff to file his Opposition to Defendants' pending Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. Entry 103); and
Whereas Defendants therefore request and Plaintiff agrees, to a two-week extension of time to file Defendants' Reply memorandum in support of their pending Motion to Dismiss; and
Whereas the Hearing on said Motion to Dismiss is currently scheduled for, July 6, 2016, the same day as the upcoming Case Management Conference, and said Hearing will need to be continued if the above-referenced extensions are granted,
THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Declaration of Joseph A. Creitz, Plaintiff and Defendants hereby stipulate to the following briefing schedule on Defendants' pending motion to dismiss and three-week continuation of the hearing date on the motion and also the currently scheduled Case Management Conference.
The existing and new requested dates are as follows:
Current Proposed Date Event
Date
06/09/2016 06/23/2016 Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss
06/16/2016 07/13/2016 Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss
06/29/2016 08/03/2016 Joint Case Management Conference Statement Due
07/06/2016 08/10/2016 Case Management Conference, and Hearing on Defendants'
Motion to Dismiss
As set forth in the accompanying Declaration of Joseph A. Creitz, good cause exists to extend the above-noted deadlines. Plaintiff requires additional time to prepare his Opposition to Defendants' pending Motion to Dismiss, and Defendants will need a corresponding two-week extension to prepare their reply and to allow time for each of the 21 Defendants to review, comment on, and consent to the Reply, particularly so close to the Fourth of July weekend. The current Hearing for the Motion to Dismiss is set for the same date as the Case Management Conference. Because judicial efficiency will be promoted by the Court having the benefit of full briefing on the Motion to Dismiss at the Conference, it is respectfully requested that the date of both the Conference and the Hearing be continued to August 10, 2016 or some other later date convenient to the Court when counsel also are available.
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that I have obtained the concurrence of all signatories other than myself in the filing of this document.
/s/Joseph A. Creitz
Joseph A. Creitz
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
