Gerritson v. Saul, 18-cv-03492-JCS. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20191107b09
Visitors: 18
Filed: Nov. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 06, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE STIPULATION FOR EAJA ATTORNEYS' FEES Re: Dkt. No. 23 JOSEPH C. SPERO , Chief Magistrate Judge . The parties filed a stipulation and proposed order awarding Plaintiff Lorita Gerritson $5,000 in attorneys' fees and $400 in costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act, and directing Defendant Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, to pay that sum to Gerritson's counsel pursuant to an agreement that Gerritson purportedly signed, so long as Gerritson does n
Summary: ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE STIPULATION FOR EAJA ATTORNEYS' FEES Re: Dkt. No. 23 JOSEPH C. SPERO , Chief Magistrate Judge . The parties filed a stipulation and proposed order awarding Plaintiff Lorita Gerritson $5,000 in attorneys' fees and $400 in costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act, and directing Defendant Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, to pay that sum to Gerritson's counsel pursuant to an agreement that Gerritson purportedly signed, so long as Gerritson does no..
More
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE STIPULATION FOR EAJA ATTORNEYS' FEES
Re: Dkt. No. 23
JOSEPH C. SPERO, Chief Magistrate Judge.
The parties filed a stipulation and proposed order awarding Plaintiff Lorita Gerritson $5,000 in attorneys' fees and $400 in costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act, and directing Defendant Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, to pay that sum to Gerritson's counsel pursuant to an agreement that Gerritson purportedly signed, so long as Gerritson does not owe a preexisting debt to the United States. The parties' stipulation does not include a copy of the purported agreement and does not indicate that the stipulation was served on Gerritson herself. It is DENIED without prejudice to filing a renewed stipulation remedying those defects.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
