SPEAR v. FENKELL, 13-2391. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20150630g97
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jun. 26, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2015
Summary: ORDER RICHARD A. LLORET , Magistrate Judge . I have reviewed Plaintiffs' Joint Motion to Quash Subpoenas issued by Stonehenge to Blank Rome, Pepper Hamilton, and Squire Sanders (Doc. No. 361), the Stonehenge Response (Doc. No. 374), and the Plaintiffs' Reply (Doc. No. 393). After careful consideration it is ORDERED As follows: 1. The Motion to Quash the Subpoenas (Doc. No. 361) issued by Stonehenge is granted in part and denied in part. 2. Alliance shall provide a redacted copy of the
Summary: ORDER RICHARD A. LLORET , Magistrate Judge . I have reviewed Plaintiffs' Joint Motion to Quash Subpoenas issued by Stonehenge to Blank Rome, Pepper Hamilton, and Squire Sanders (Doc. No. 361), the Stonehenge Response (Doc. No. 374), and the Plaintiffs' Reply (Doc. No. 393). After careful consideration it is ORDERED As follows: 1. The Motion to Quash the Subpoenas (Doc. No. 361) issued by Stonehenge is granted in part and denied in part. 2. Alliance shall provide a redacted copy of the ..
More
ORDER
RICHARD A. LLORET, Magistrate Judge.
I have reviewed Plaintiffs' Joint Motion to Quash Subpoenas issued by Stonehenge to Blank Rome, Pepper Hamilton, and Squire Sanders (Doc. No. 361), the Stonehenge Response (Doc. No. 374), and the Plaintiffs' Reply (Doc. No. 393). After careful consideration it is
ORDERED
As follows:
1. The Motion to Quash the Subpoenas (Doc. No. 361) issued by Stonehenge is granted in part and denied in part.
2. Alliance shall provide a redacted copy of the Squire Sanders settlement agreement containing the following by July 10, 2015:
a. The names of the parties and dates of agreement;
b. Signature of the parties;
c. Any indemnification provisions between Squire Sanders and Alliance.
Source: Leagle
