ROMERO v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, 01-3894 (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20151113e67
Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 12, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 12, 2015
Summary: ORDER RONALD L. BUCKWALTER , Senior District Judge . AND NOW , this 10 th day of November , 2015, upon consideration of the Partial Motion by Defendants Allstate Insurance Company, et al. ("Allstate Defendants") to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint and the Harris and McLaughlin Intervenor Complaints (Docket No. 656), the Partial Motion by Defendant Edward Liddy to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint and the Harris and McLaughlin Intervenor Complaints (Docket N
Summary: ORDER RONALD L. BUCKWALTER , Senior District Judge . AND NOW , this 10 th day of November , 2015, upon consideration of the Partial Motion by Defendants Allstate Insurance Company, et al. ("Allstate Defendants") to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint and the Harris and McLaughlin Intervenor Complaints (Docket No. 656), the Partial Motion by Defendant Edward Liddy to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint and the Harris and McLaughlin Intervenor Complaints (Docket No..
More
ORDER
RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, Senior District Judge.
AND NOW, this 10th day of November, 2015, upon consideration of the Partial Motion by Defendants Allstate Insurance Company, et al. ("Allstate Defendants") to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint and the Harris and McLaughlin Intervenor Complaints (Docket No. 656), the Partial Motion by Defendant Edward Liddy to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint and the Harris and McLaughlin Intervenor Complaints (Docket No. 657), Plaintiffs' Consolidated Response in Opposition (Docket No. 689), the Allstate Defendants' Reply Brief (Docket No. 700), and Defendant Liddy's Reply Brief (Docket No. 701), it is hereby ORDERED that both Motions are GRANTED. Plaintiffs and Intervenors' state law breach-of-contract and breach-of-fiduciary claims (Counts V-VII in the Romero Third Amended Complaint and Counts IV-VI in the Harris and McLaughlin Complaints) and Plaintiffs and Intervenors' retaliation claims under the ADEA and ERISA concerning their termination of employment are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
It is so ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
