Clark v. Saul, 1:17-CV-137. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Utah
Number: infdco20190924e78
Visitors: 37
Filed: Sep. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 23, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DEE BENSON , District Judge . Before the court is the Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero, recommending that Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen be denied. The parties were notified of their right to file objections to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days after receiving it. Neither party has filed such an objection. Having reviewed all relevant materials, including the reasoning set fort
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DEE BENSON , District Judge . Before the court is the Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero, recommending that Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen be denied. The parties were notified of their right to file objections to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days after receiving it. Neither party has filed such an objection. Having reviewed all relevant materials, including the reasoning set forth..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
DEE BENSON, District Judge.
Before the court is the Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero, recommending that Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen be denied.
The parties were notified of their right to file objections to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days after receiving it. Neither party has filed such an objection.
Having reviewed all relevant materials, including the reasoning set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
